2
1
3
Literature & Humanities
http://lava-al-hamd.ir
1
admin
9
10
8
7
14
8888
13
fa
jalali
1401
5
1
gregorian
2022
8
1
3
5
online
1
fulltext
other
علماء مدرسه الحلّه ونشر التشیّع؛ أسباب تقسیمات
الحدیث والتعامل السندی مع الروایات
Causes of Classification of Traditions and the Interaction of Chain of Narrators with the Traditions
عمومى
General
پژوهشي
Research
یصل الکاتب فی ضمن مناقشه مؤشرات اختبار الحیثیه لروایات الشیعه<br>
الی مقسمه ذات اربعه اجزاء التی شاعت بین علماء الشیعه من عهد العلّمه الحلّی<br>
) 648 - 726 ق( ثم ینقل ک لام الشیخ بهاء الدین العاملی و صاحب المعالم و یقوم بنقده و<br>
مناقشته. ثم یحصل علی هذا الاستنتاج بالمناقشه و دراسه آثار عدد من العلماء البارزین<br>
للمکتب الحدیثیّه و الفقهیّه للحلّه ای العلّمه الحلّی، المحقّق الحلّی ) 602 - 776 ق(،<br>
و الشهید الاول ) 734 - 786 ق( و النتیجه هی أنّ هؤلاء العلماء یعتبرون الاحادیث التی<br>
علی اقسام الحدیث الاربعه تعدّ «الحدیث الضعیف » و جعلوه اساس فتاواهم.طرحت<br>
فی هذه المقاله ضروریه دراسه التاریخ الاجتماعی للشیعه فی ضمن دراسه تاریخ الفکر<br>
الشیعی و مقارنه ثلاثه ک تب من العلّمه الحلّی ایضاً و هی «منتهی المطلب « ،» مختلف<br>
الشیعه » و «تذکره الفقهاء .
<span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="line-height:107%"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span lang="EN-IN" style="font-size:14.0pt"><span style="line-height:107%">While examining the measurement of validation of Shiite narrations, the author comes to a fourfold classification that became popular among Shia scholars since the era of Allamah Hilli (648 – 726 A.H.). Thereafter, he quotes, criticises, and evaluates the words of Shaikh Bahaauddeen Aameli (r.a.) and Saaheb-e-Maalim. In this context, the author, by reviewing and examining the works of several prominent scholars of traditions and the jurisprudence school of Hilla, viz. Allamah Hilli, Mohaqqeq Hilli (602 -676 A.H.) and Shaheed-e-Awwal (734 – 786 A.H.) concludes that these very narrations which they considered as weak as per their fourfold classification of traditions, they have made them (i.e., the narrations) as the bases of their edicts i.e., they consider them to be valid and reliable. The necessity of analysing the social history of the Shiites while examining the history of Shia thought, as well as the comparison of three books of Allamah Hilli (r.a.) [Muntaha al-Matlab, Mukhtalaf al-Shia, and Tazkerah al-Fuqahaa], are also discussed in this article. </span></span></span></span></span><br>
اختبار الحیثیه لروایات الشیعه؛ المؤشرات؛ المقسمات الاربع
لاحادیث الشیعه؛ العلّمه الحلّی؛ صاحب المعالم؛ الحدیث الضعیف؛ التاریخ الاجتماعی
للشیعه.
Measuring the validity of Shiite traditions – indicators, fourfold classification of Shiite traditions, Allamah Hilli (r.a.), Mohaqqeq Hilli (r.a.), Shaheed-e-Awwal (r.a.), Shaikh Bahaauddeen Aameli (r.a.), Saaheb-e-Maalem, Weak Traditions, Social histo
92
124
http://lava-al-hamd.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-2-63&slc_lang=other&sid=1
محمدحسین
افراخته
100319475328460077
100319475328460077
Yes